Is Linux Mint a secure distribution?

Linux Mint and Safety Issues
Steam Mint was lambasted by some in the press for safety issues throughout the past couple of decades. But how true are these perceptions? Does Linux Mint suffer from safety issues or is it much ado about nothing?
A writer at DistroWatch wades to the controversy and analyzes some of the myths and myths about Linux Mint and security.
[The InfoWorld roundup: 5 rock-solid Linux distros for programmers. | Stay on open source together with all the InfoWorld Linux Report newsletter.]
Jesse Smith accounts for DistroWatch:

Some of the frequent mistakes I've encountered lately have included with the Linux Mint distribution. Mint has been a favorite job in the last several years and now, with lots of individuals using the supply and speaking about the job, there's certain to be some mis-communication. Specifically, the majority of the rumours and mistakes I've encountered have revolved around Mint's safety practises and background. I'd love to clean up some of the more prevalent rumours.
Probably the most common misconception I encounter is that Linux Mint's update supervisor blocks access to security updates. This isn't completely true, but it's simple to comprehend where the thought came out. Before, Mint's upgrade supervisor would exhibit a complete list of available safety upgrades with every upgrade delegated a security score. A score of one or 2 signaled the software was secure to set up. A score of three was that the default option and considered largely secure, if untested. A score of five or four suggested the upgrade was supposed to cause stability problems. Installing a badly rated upgrade may stop the machine from booting or induce the desktop to quit functioning correctly.
Another frequent rumour is that Mint waits safety upgrades, inducing repairs to arrive in Mint afterwards compared to other distributions like Debian or Ubuntu. This rumour is completely untrue and I've been not able to locate a cause for your promise. Mint includes two wheeled distributions, Ubuntu to the Primary versions of Linux Mint and Debian for Linux Mint Debian Edition. Both tastes of Mint pull safety upgrades straight from their various upstream distributions. The upgrades aren't filtered. It follows that when security upgrades seem in Debian's repositories, the upgrades can be found to Linux Mint Debian Edition users. Similarly, when Ubuntu publishes a security fix, it may be immediately downloaded from Linux Mint users. There's not any delay or hold put on packages until they become accessible to Mint users.
As it stands, Linux Mint's security document is about the same as other popular Linux distributions. There are a few minor issues, but nothing from the ordinary. For the most part, Mint's reputation regarding software security largely appears to grow from misunderstandings about the way in which the supply's update manager functions.
More in DistroWatch

The post in DistroWatch captured the eye of redditors from the Steam subreddit and they shared their own ideas regarding Linux Mint and safety:

Halfpac: "First he admits Mint is holding rear safety upgrades, and talks down it by mentioning you are able to install them at your own risk. Then in the next paragraph that he denies Mint upgrades are postponed since they are pulled straight from Ubuntu or Debian's repositories, which can be accurate, but due to the stability issues they are not recommended upgrades in Mint till they're analyzed...
That is exactly what the rest of us phone held back, and postponed upgrades!
"Oh no, it is possible to install anything you would like in your own risk, however, the things we urge - that is postponed"."
726829201992228386: "Jump the bullshit PR bit and browse the major article on affirming ISO pictures."
Drakofrost: "It is funny the way the article totally ignores the reality that together with all the default configurations, kernel upgrades aren't set up, which renders the machine completely exposed.
Along with the ISO was jeopardized, even the Linux Mint team confessed it. QuidsUp did a movie covering the topic.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fj-fBae6i-I
This seems like a paid post, also it had been written by someone linked to this Linux Mint team"
VelvetElvis: "As a Ubuntu derivative, nothing in Universe will get safety support. That is the major issue, IMHO."
Adevland: "Linux is all about user choice.
If you opt not to install the upgrades, that is your own problem.
This was the situation with windows up till windows 10 whenever they began forcing upgrades. Apparently folks hate that also.
So folks here hate it if consumers get to select what updates to install, and they despise it when upgrades are mandatory.
These folks are haters and cannot be fulfilled no matter how upgrades are sent."
Dog_cow: "Is this man saying that when a person were to prevent installing security updates as they're flagged as large risk - they'd then receive a minimal risk edition of the equal upgrade within a brief quantity of time (e.g. Within a couple of days)?
I.e.. At worst is that a Mint user only going to be a couple of days behind?"
More in Reddit

Distraction-free writing in the control line with WordGrinder
You will find quite a couple of word processing software available for Linux, but the majority of them are GUI-based and full of potential distractions. WordGrinder is a command line program which offers a distraction-free writing atmosphere.
Christine Hall reports on WordGrinder for FOSS Force:

As advertised, it is uber-easy. Easy enough that I am writing this article on this today.
Among my motives for wanting to discover a command line tool for writing would be to eliminate distractions. This might not be as much an issue to generations of authors that honed their writing skills using WordPerfect, Writer, or gawd forbid, MS Word, but to those people who spent the first half their professions sitting in a typewriter, contemporary GUIs are undoubtedly a diversion. Having a typewriter, there is only you and the newspaper.
For me personally, WordGrinder solves both issues. Together with the terminal window maximized, there are no distracting bells and whistles around the monitor. It is only me and the words I have written. And although navigation throughout the text to get a small cursory editing is simple enough, not needing the use of this mouse makes it only hard enough to remove the temptation to "just stop for a minute and mend that paragraph"
In fact, it's that this "diversion free" angle that was accountable for WordGrinder being developed at the first location. The app would be the work of David Given, who desired a distraction free approach to compose a book. What he came up with is something which's not dissimilar to code editors like Vim or Emacs, but considerably easier and simpler to use. It is also not a full featured word processor with no stretch of the imagination. However, it will include a surprisingly rich set of attributes, and my own experience so far is that it is ideal for getting words on paper for this very first draft -- that for me is the toughest aspect of writing.
More in FOSS Force

Desktop Linux just keeps getting better and better
Desktop Linux has come a lengthy way from where it began, and it offers many users a fantastic computing experience. A writer at Network World shared his ideas about how Linux has improved over the desktop computer.
Bryan Lunduke accounts for Network World:

Desktop Linux, right now, is far better than it has ever been.
With a long shot. A feat that's genuinely wonderful.
You know how many working system firms (not mentioning names or pointing fingers here) are inclined to launch new versions of the systems with the guarantee of amazing new features, but in fact, each launch almost appears to be worse than the one earlier? Enormous performance degradation. Enormous jumps in memory utilization. Decreases in equilibrium. Increases in spyware or adware built into the computer system.
As I recorded those off issues, each one of us immediately thought of a particular OS and a particular feature. And if that idea crossed our minds, we're entertained (since we do not utilize that program) or upset (since we do). Regardless, we have all acquired examples of these issues added in with brand new releases of big-name, proprietary operating systems.